News: Finance

Marcus & Millichap arranges $6.53m in refinancing for two props.

Sun Plaza, 151 Old Ridgefield Road - Wilton, CT

Wilton, CT Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation (MMCC) has completed the arrangement of $6.53 million in financing across two transactions–one for a mixed-use medical office and retail property at Sun Plaza, 151 Old Ridgefield Rd. in Wilton, and another for an outdoor shopping center at Elm St. Center at 447 Monroe Tpke. in Monroe, Conn. Steven Rock, first vice president, capital markets in MMCC’s Westchester office, arranged the financing for both deals.

“Both properties are well-located and offer stable tenant bases,” said Rock. “With the retail and medical office markets continuing upward trends post-pandemic, we were able to field competitive lending processes for both.”

The $3.43 million debt acquisition loan for the property in Wilton, CT, has a 70-percent LTV and a seven-year term with an interest rate of 3.5 percent. It was structured with a 25-year amortization and a five-year treasury index rate. The $3.1 million debt acquisition loan for the property in Monroe, CT also had a 70-percent LTV loan with a seven-year term and an interest rate of 3.5 percent. It was structured with a 25-year amortization and a five-year treasury index rate, as well.

The property in Wilton was built in 2009, has five units and is two stories with major tenants, including a dental practice and a dance conservatory. The property in Monroe is a multi-tenant neighborhood strip center with six units, including Subway and Dunkin’ Donuts.

Tags: Finance
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.