News: Spotlight Content

Real estate transactions involving underground storage tanks can be complicated but successful - by John Dorsey

John Dorsey,
Ferrucci Russo P.C.

The purchase and sale of real estate involving underground storage tanks (“UST”) can create complications in reaching a successful sale transaction. Understanding the applicable local and state laws and regulations can minimize the hurdles in reaching a successful closing on properties with USTs.

Special requirements exist for certain USTs that buyers and sellers should become familiar. Pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws § 46-12-3(21) all single-wall USTs must be removed and closed if the USTs were installed prior to May 8, 1985. The deadline for the removal and closure of these USTs is December 22, 2017. The removal requirement also applies to double-wall USTs that are regulated as a single-walled UST. USTs installed between May 8, 1985 and July 20, 1992 must be closed within thirty-two (32) years from the date of installation, provided that the owner of the UST performs annual compliance inspections.

The operation, maintenance, removal and closure of USTs is governed by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Rules and Regulations for Underground Storage Facilities Used for Petroleum Products and Hazardous Materials (the “UST Regulations”). The UST Regulations provide further guidance with regard to minimum operations and maintenance requirements as well as the process for removal and closure. 

Owners of facilities with single-wall USTs that are approaching the deadline for closure need to follow the procedures for closure of USTs in order to avoid additional cost and expenses. Typically, closure of a UST will require its removal. In very limited circumstances, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (“RIDEM”) has authority to approve closure of a UST “in place” rather than by removal, if the requirements for an exemption are met. Further, for USTs that do require removal, the UST may be able to be replaced with a new double-walled UST.

In either scenario, a closure application must be submitted to RIDEM. If a single-wall UST is not removed prior to the applicable deadline, parties could face monetary penalties and/or other enforcement actions. For tanks that were installed between May 8, 1985 and July 20, 1992 sellers and buyers need to be aware of the requirements for performing the annual compliance inspections.

As part of the diligence process, buyers should familiarize themselves as to whether USTs are involved in the sale transaction and if so what type of UST is involved. USTs are generally registered with RIDEM. Buyers can obtain information on USTs that are suspected to be located at a property. In the event that a UST requires removal, buyers should work to identify the cost of removal and determine whether a replacement UST would be a necessary part of the sale transaction. 

Understanding the UST Regulations and identifying the potential costs involved in complying with the UST Regulations is important to both the seller and buyer in a transaction to avoid post-closing disputes and additional unanticipated costs. The seller and buyer should address these issues at the time that they are negotiating the purchase and sale of real estate. While the removal and closure of USTs can be a costly process, addressing these issues early in the negotiating process can reduce disputes and give the transaction a better opportunity for a successful result. 

John Dorsey Jr., Esq., is an attorney with Ferrucci Russo P.C., Providence, R.I.

MORE FROM Spotlight Content

NEREJ’s 2026 Mid Year Review Spotlight

NEREJ’s 2026 Mid Year Review Spotlight is underway. This special section will feature perspectives from across commercial real estate as firms reflect on the first half of the year and discuss the trends, challenges, and opportunities shaping the months ahead.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Shallow-bay wins on 495/128:  A renewal-driven market with a thin pipeline - by Nate Nickerson

Shallow-bay wins on 495/128: A renewal-driven market with a thin pipeline - by Nate Nickerson

The Boston industrial market entered mid-2025 in a bifurcated state. Large-block vacancy remains elevated, while shallow-bay along the 495/128 corridor continues to prove resilient. Fieldstone’s focus on this geography positions us squarely in the middle of a renewal-driven, supply-constrained
How do we manage our businesses in a climate of uncertainty? - by David O'Sullivan

How do we manage our businesses in a climate of uncertainty? - by David O'Sullivan

These are uncertain times for the home building industry. We have the threat of tariffs mixed with high interest rates and lenders nervous about the market. Every professional, whether builder, broker, or architect, asks themselves, how do we manage our business in today’s climate? We all strive not just to succeed, but
Limited supply fuels landlord‑friendly conditions in Rhode Island’s industrial market - by Julie Freshman and George Paskalis

Limited supply fuels landlord‑friendly conditions in Rhode Island’s industrial market - by Julie Freshman and George Paskalis

As we enter the spring of 2026, the Rhode Island industrial real estate market stands on stable footing, following several years of resilience fueled by constrained supply, steady demand, and dynamic economic conditions.

As legacy names recalibrate, new entrants are moving in with fresh capital, new technologies, and business models tailored to today’s supply-chain needs - by Michael Harrington

As legacy names recalibrate, new entrants are moving in with fresh capital, new technologies, and business models tailored to today’s supply-chain needs - by Michael Harrington

Southern New Hampshire’s industrial market has always punched above its weight. For decades, the region has attracted a mix of advanced manufacturing, beverage and food producers, logistics operators, and specialty