News: Finance

Understanding how 1031 like-kind exchanges and vacation homes work - by Bill Lopriore

Bill Lopriore
First American Exchange Co., LLC

Many people own rental properties in vacation locations. With proper planning, a tax-deferred exchange may help them enjoy their vacation property to a limited extent, while still having the tax benefits available from a tax-deferred exchange. 

It’s important to understand that property held for personal use does not qualify for tax-deferred treatment under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031. To qualify for tax-deferred treatment under §1031, both the relinquished and replacement properties must be held for investment purposes or for use in the taxpayer’s trade or business. 

But, what about vacation homes? Personal use is usually why they were acquired, but how much personal use is too much under §1031? Does the property have to be rented out to be considered an investment?

There is some legal precedence on this topic. The taxpayers in one case faced this exact dilemma (see Barry E. Moore et ux. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo, 2007-134; No. 11002-03, May 30, 2007). They owned lake property that they used during weekends in the summer, with occasional maintenance visits in the off season until later years when maintenance decreased substantially. They exchanged the lake house for property closer to home and used the new property even more often. The court disallowed the exchange, finding that the property was held primarily for personal use, not for investment.

The mere hope or expectation of appreciation was not sufficient to establish investment intent. The taxpayers in this case never attempted to rent either property, never claimed deductions for maintenance or depreciation, and deducted the interest as home mortgage interest. Also, their eventual failure to properly maintain the relinquished property was inconsistent with investment intent.

In 2007, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration issued a report recommending additional oversight of like-kind exchanges concerning both second homes and vacation homes. In response, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Revenue Procedure 2008-16, which provides a safe harbor. If the procedures are followed, the IRS will not challenge whether a property qualifies as being held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment. An exchange may fall outside the safe harbor and still qualify, but expect more scrutiny from the IRS.

Generally, the Revenue Procedure requires that both the relinquished and replacement properties must have been owned by the taxpayer for at least 24 months immediately before and after the exchange. In each of the two 12-month periods immediately before and after the exchange, the properties must be rented at a fair market value for a minimum of 14 days or more. The taxpayer’s personal use cannot exceed the 14 days or 10% of the days during each 12-month period that the property was rented at a fair market value (whichever is greater).

Also, it is important to know that “personal use” is not limited just to use by the taxpayer. It also includes use by:

• The taxpayer’s family members; 

• Any other person with an interest in the unit, or their families; 

• Anyone using the unit under an arrangement which enables the taxpayer to use some other dwelling unit (even if no rent is charged); or 

• Anyone, if the rent paid on the property is less than fair market value rent.

You must meet the ownership requirements mentioned above, limit personal use of the property to 14 days per year or 10% of the rental period (whichever is greater). And, if you use the property for any additional days for repairs and maintenance, you must be ready to show proof of the actual maintenance that was completed. 

The property should be rented to an unrelated party for at least 14 days per year, but there is no need to rent the property for more than 14 days. You may also rent the property to a related party, if they use it as their principal residence and pay fair market value rent.

It is also important to treat the property as an investment. Make sure that the property is properly maintained. Deduct expenses for maintenance, utilities, insurance and depreciation. Also, any mortgage should be an investment loan, not a loan for a primary residence. 

A tax-deferred exchange is one of the few wealth-building tools available to virtually any investor. Taxpayers should consider the benefits of a tax-deferred exchange whenever they plan to sell property that is not their principal residence. 

Bill Lopriore is the northeast regional manager and counsel for First American Exchange Company, LLC, Wayland, Mass. 

Nothing contained in this article is to be considered as the rendering of legal advice for specific cases, and readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. This article is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of this author, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of this author’s employer, First American Exchange Company, LLC.

Tags: Finance
MORE FROM Finance

C-Lounge Capital provides $18m equity investment for $48m acquisition of Fountains of Boca Raton by Interface Properties

Boca Raton, FL C-Lounge Capital provides $18m equity investment for $48m acquisition of Fountains of Boca Raton by Interface Properties. C-Lounge Capital is a relationship-driven family office investment platform backed by more than 50 years of commercial real estate experience.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.