News: Finance

Balkanization of real estate: Smaller pieces, lower prices, lower risk

Imagine a time when you book a venue for a two hour cocktail party before the Metropolitan Opera or a three hour slot afterwards for a late night dinner. It certainly could be a restaurant, a hotel or even a country club...not that hard to imagine. But, what if I told you, it's the penthouse of an upper west side New York building that's being rented out in increments of hours or days. It's actually happening under an internet based platform called Airbnb, whereby entrepreneurs are master leasing apartments on an annual basis and subleasing them in increments as small as a few hours. Maybe you've stayed in one. An article on this activity got me thinking about the decentralization or "balkanization" of real estate. There is a never ending search to figure out ways to take large blocks of assets, break them down into smaller pieces, and sell or rent them. This is not a new phenomenon, but it has certainly been advanced due to internet/mobile technology, communications, and large data bases. Historically, examples abound - from political candidate marketing to "crowd source" funding for small companies. Venues span over political, financial and social arenas, and activities range from sharing news, opinions, planes, cars and of course real estate. Essentially, it is an age old concept of marketplace, whereby people with assets seek to create markets to move them from wholesale to retail, both for profit and for reducing risk of ownership. Aside from ancient marketplaces, one of the relatively new and relevant aspects of this is the stock market. Started in Venice Italy in the 1300's, but better known to us as the NYSE in 1800, entrepreneurs figured out a model to turn wholly owned private companies into companies owned by individuals, in smaller pieces. This not only provided a new means of building wealth for the common man, but also a way for companies to raise money and share the risk, as well as the profits, of innovation. It was one of the best and early examples of decentralization. This of course has morphed over the decades into instruments like ETFs, whereby stocks of similar companies are grouped together to form new stocks, or mutual funds of diverse stocks are grouped to provide diversity and access to ownership. Related to real estate, one of the best examples of decentralization is that of loans. Back in the day, real estate loans were typically made to individuals with personal recourse if debt was not paid. Starting in 1970, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development created financial instruments whereby loans were securitized, that is, made into smaller pieces to sell to individuals in the financial marketplace. The common man could now enjoy a small role as banker, profiting from a reasonable interest rate, and the original or primary lender could decentralize its risk. Securitization was often accompanied by "tranche lending," whereby pieces of loans were commoditized, rated for security, and sold to various investor groups or banks, depending upon their appetite for risk. On a somewhat parallel track, residential real estate "balkanization" was moving from buildings like hotels, an obvious historical example short term lodging, to cooperatives, condominiums, point shares and time shares. These were all great entrepreneurial ideas to create real estate in smaller portions, with more flexibility of ownership and use, for less cost to the consumer...and of course providing more profit to the entrepreneurial creator. Alongside of this came Real Estate Investment Trusts which allowed individuals to own pieces of properties, typically grouped by similarity of use, and managed by competent professionals. A recent update of this is a REIT for an individual building. Real estate is also in the process of moving more towards concepts of office sharing, flex space, versatile open floor plans, in some cases "virtual office." Technology is helping innovation in changing older real estate paradigms into more decentralized concepts, whereby entrepreneurial individuals can enter into, and influence, the marketplace from small startup companies, financed by small startup investors, with small communication instruments such as smart phones and tablets. Where this leads to, one can only imagine. It will certainly meet road blocks, ranging from union taxi drivers (think Uber) to rental contracts prohibiting subleasing, to financial contracts limiting loan selling, to plain old cultural resistance. Despite those obstacles, one thing I know from experience is, it will continue to amaze us, and provide opportunities to entrepreneurs as well as consumers, and thus is a tsunami which will not be stopped. Daniel Calano, CRE, is the managing partner and principal of Prospectus, LLC, Cambridge, Mass.
MORE FROM Finance

Kozlowski of Newmark Capital Markets secures $115.6 million financing for two properties in CT

East Lyme, CT Newmark has arranged $115.6 million in financing on behalf of the sponsor to refinance The Cove at Gateway Commons and Sound at Gateway Commons. Newmark Capital Markets Strategies managing director Avi Kozlowski secured the financing through Freddie Mac.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property