News: Finance

Daniel Calano - Housing redux: The end is not in sight

One month residential sales volume are up, but prices are down. The next month prices are up, but volume is down. The next week, both volume and price are down, except in a N.Y., D.C., Boston and San Francisco. Next month Miami, of all places is up. Confused? Yes, and likely to stay that way for awhile. Assuming that all of these statements above are accurately reported, there are a lot of statistics seemingly in conflict. But really, they only seem in conflict at any given moment, because things have been changing rapidly in both positive and negative directions. The Wall Street Journal has summarized it well this past week indicating that, in fact, there is a double dip recession in housing, with prices back to 2002 levels, erasing one decade of housing wealth growth. The facts are that housing values dropped from a peak in 2006 (depending upon location) to what was considered the low in 2009. The economic recession officially ended in June of 2009, two years ago. At that point, housing values appeared to move up from their lows, because of stimulus and housing credits, to prices where most people called it a rebound. However, reversing, prices have dropped consistently from there over the last 8 months back to 2009 levels, which essentially the same as 2002. For all the peaks and valleys, it is essentially a flat line representing zero growth in the last 10 years. The problem is that it may continue downward from here, or stay flat for a long time, because of the following overhanging issues: There is a shadow inventory of houses in actual default, technically default, or foreclosure. The clearing of this market has been delayed by banks forestalling, rather than foreclosing, sometimes because of well-intentioned forgiveness of debt, or sometimes due to unwillingness to write off too much too soon, or sometimes due to legal issues such as "robo" signing, fraudulent signatures and paperwork during the foreclosure process. As a result, there has been a mere four million foreclosures or short sales since 2007, with estimates ranging wildly from seven million to 18 million remaining to happen. While the range varies dramatically, all agree that there are many more to come versus those that have been finished. And, while many loans continue to be "modified" with the intent of avoiding foreclosure, the recidivism rate of second round default is approximately 70%. One would think that, with the lowest interest rate in years, the lowest prices for a decade, and plenty of supply, buyers would be snapping up housing and thus reducing current and future potential inventory. Apparently not true. There is a group of buyers who have been burned, and a new generation who do not believe in the value appreciation of the past ever materializing again. Young people are questioning why to buy, when there is the potential for prices falling lower, or remaining flat with no appreciation for years. In addition, while loans are available at low rates, closing one is difficult, equity requirements are high, and the credit review process is rigorous, all for good reasons. However, the result is there are fewer than expected buyers. So what's a person to do? As best stated in the Wall Street Journal, the trend is not your friend. For the most part, housing prices will remain flat or possibly decline, depending on the area. It is unlikely there will be any more housing credit to stimulate this market. Quantitative easing ends in this month, and there seemed to be no possibility for QE3. That might change, but based on history, will have little impact on the housing market. It will take substantial improvements in the economy, supported by low interest rates to move values back up the curve. Given history, it may be many years before we are back spending from our home equity lines. Daniel Calano, CRE, is the managing partner and principal of Prospectus, LLC, Cambridge, Mass.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.