News: Owners Developers & Managers

New grouping disclosure rules

The Internal Revenue Code provides that deductions from passive businesses or rental activities generally may only offset income from other passive activities (exclusive of portfolio income). Upon a taxpayer's disposition of his entire interest in a passive activity, any suspended losses are treated as nonpassive and are not subject to these limitations. A dominant tax planning goal, therefore, is to create passive income and nonpassive loss. This goal is restricted by rules requiring taxpayers to identify separate "activities" which, unfortunately, do not permit taxpayers with the benefit of hindsight to regroup activities in a later year simply to maximize deductions. Careful planning is crucial to prevent whipsaw (i.e., one activity with passive losses and another with nonpassive income). For example, a broad grouping of operations into a single activity may preserve the possibility that the profits from one operation will be sheltered with losses of the other. However, if only the unprofitable operation is subsequently disposed, the broad grouping may prevent deduction of any suspended losses because of the disposition rules. Currently, there is no affirmative statement required to be filed to report a taxpayer's activity groupings. Compliance with the grouping rules is enforced on audit of a taxpayer's return. Revenue agents auditing a particular return are instructed to check later years' returns for consistency of a taxpayer's groupings. This may change as the IRS recently proposed rules for disclosing activity groupings. A taxpayer would be required to file a written statement with his original return for the first tax year in which one or more businesses or rental activities are grouped as single or separate activities. A similar statement would be required for changes to an existing grouping, such as addition of a new activity, disposition of an activity, or a regrouping because it is determined that the original grouping was clearly inappropriate or a material change in facts or circumstances has made the original grouping inappropriate. The change would be effective on the date the IRS publishes final guidance. Juliette Pico is an attorney with Lourie & Cutler, Boston, Mass.
MORE FROM Owners Developers & Managers

Atlantic Property Management expands facilities maintenance platform: Assigned two new facility management contracts in RI

Boston, MA Atlantic Property Management (APM) has expanded its internal facilities maintenance and operations platform and has been assigned two new facility management contracts in Rhode Island. The properties will undergo redevelopment and repositioning
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Connecticut’s Transfer Act will expire in 2026. What should property owners do now? - by Samuel Haydock

Connecticut’s Transfer Act will expire in 2026. What should property owners do now? - by Samuel Haydock

A major shift in Connecticut’s environmental law is on the horizon: the state’s Transfer Act will expire next year, ushering in a new cleanup program with broader applicability and new triggers.
New Quonset pier supports small businesses and economic growth - by Steven J. King

New Quonset pier supports small businesses and economic growth - by Steven J. King

Quonset recently celebrated a milestone nearly 70 years in the making when federal, state, and local leaders joined us for the ribbon cutting of the new Terminal 5 Pier and Blue Economy Support Docks at the Port of Davisville.
Unlocking value for commercial real estate: Solar solutions for a changing market - by Claire Broido Johnson

Unlocking value for commercial real estate: Solar solutions for a changing market - by Claire Broido Johnson

As the commercial real estate market continues to navigate the disruptive forces of rising vacancy rates and increasing operating costs, landlords are under pressure to find new levers to protect income and strengthen asset performance. Amid these challenges, onsite solar and battery storage – particularly when financed through third-party ownership models – are emerging not just as environmental upgrades, but as powerful financial strategies.
Tenant Estoppel certificates: Navigating risks, responses and leverage - by Laura Kaplan

Tenant Estoppel certificates: Navigating risks, responses and leverage - by Laura Kaplan

When it comes to the sale or financing of real property, tenant estoppel certificates are not just formalities – they are crucial documents that confirm the status of existing leases. Tenant estoppel certificates offer prospective buyers and lenders necessary assurance regarding the property’s financials and any