No Independent Valuation Protection Institute for you!
HVCC required Fannie and Freddie to create and fund an entity, the Independent Valuation Protection Institute to combat unacceptable appraisal practices and code violations and could have proposed amendments to HVCC. Over five years, Fannie and Freddie were to provide $24 million in funding.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency recently indicated that the GSEs will not fund this agency given the magnitude of their mortgage losses. The proposed solution is for the entities to create a standardized complaint form, a way to submit Internet complaints, and to refer cases of impropriety to regulators.
Both the Appraisal Institute (AI) and the Realtors (NAR) are both disappointed that "a fully funded" valuation institute won't be created. AI stated the entities should "do more than simply make referrals." NAR said setting up a complaint process is "a good beginning" but falls short.
We too should be disappointed. An HVCC bright spot was creating the institute to handle HVCC related complains. This component was an absolute necessity to maintain the accountability of parties to the HVCC. Referring complaints to overworked and understaffed state regulatory agencies is not a solution at all.
What kind of math indicates that it "doesn't make sense" to fund given the small investment (millions over years) versus the billons lost? At stake is nothing less than residential appraiser's survival and ability to provide competent, independent, unbiased appraisals without undue pressure. However, this may ultimately be at odds with the goal having a docile, captive home appraisal industry.
By not funding the Institute, the ability to propose HVCC changes is hurt. And changes are necessary given the results to date. Appraisers report the lowest common denominator - quickest turnaround, lowest price- seems to dominate. Appraisal users don't appear to be pleased with appraisal quality.
Experienced appraisers are beyond frustration at this point. Most feel that the code has pushed them to brink.
If the entities can't or won't fund the Institute, can the appraisal industry step forward and do it? Many professional appraisal groups, marginalized in the HVCC process, could play a role in creating this necessary next evolutionary step.
William Pastuszek, MAI, SRA, heads Shepherd Associates, Newton, Mass.
How many of you remember real estate development in the late 1980s? Project sourcing was difficult, until it wasn’t. Into the 90’s, a few years after, banks and other financial institutions were very happy to fund projects.
The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property