News: Finance

President's message: What a year for appraisers!

As I write this article I have one day left in my term as president of the Mass. chapter of the Appraisal Institute. To say I picked an exciting year to be president would be a drastic understatement. Indeed we have seen a crash in the stock markets, a further depression of most real estate markets, credit markets at a near standstill, and predictions from many respected economists that we have seen the end of capitalism, as we know it. Other than that, pretty ordinary year. The genesis of the current economic crisis according to many was the sub-prime mortgage meltdown and the toxic debt held by firms such as AIG, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac among others. The cause of this meltdown was loose credit standards, and in some opinions, poor appraisals. Now, I will repeat myself. Appraisers have little to no responsibility for the current economic chaos. But that is my opinion, and in Washington D.C. and on Wall Street, my opinion matters little. The opinions that count suggest that changes are needed in the appraisal process. There are 4-5 different pieces of legislation either being enacted or written regarding the appraisal process. Some are good, and call for increased professionalism and qualifications in the industry. A couple are disasters in the making and will lead to the end of the residential appraisal industry as we know it. The HVCC or "Cuomo Agreement" is aimed at reducing lender pressure on residential appraisers. It will force all appraisals fore residential lending purposes to be ordered through appraisal management companies or AMCs. It is expected to be enacted in 2009. It will not work as hoped. The pressure on appraisers to inflate values will only be shifted from the lenders to the AMCs. And the creation of these all-powerful AMCs will create further downward pressure on appraisal fees. Adjusted for inflation, residential appraisal fees are truly down about 25% from 20 years ago. Faster, cheaper is all that matters and as a result the quality of the appraisers left in the lender driven residential appraisal business will continue to decline. It is truly becoming more profitable to work at a fast food franchise than to be a residential appraiser in the lender driven segment of the market. But at least we won't have pressure from lenders. Yeah! And if the HVCC isn't misguided enough, there is another piece of legislation being sponsored by Senator Dodd of Connecticut that calls for the bonding of appraisers. This is so consumers will have a private right of action against appraisers that commit fraudulent valuations. So after paying $10,000 - $15,000 annually for the bond, appraisers will be subjected to trial attorneys who will be able to scour through appraisals to see if their client was "wronged." This is great. Now if an appraiser says houses is worth $400,000 today, and in three years they can only get $380,000, guess whom Mr. Attorney is contacting? If this bill passes expect all of your favorite personal injury lawyers that advertise on radio to create "appraiser fraud" departments. "Has your home been under or overvalued? Call me. Not all of the proposed rule changes and legislation is misguided. Some are truly hitting the mark in their intent. In North Carolina there is a proposal to actually require that an appraiser have an office outside of the home. The intent here is getting the industry away from the trend of being a cottage, at-home industry. Other rules, such as those enacted by the IRS put the onus of the quality of the appraisal on those who hire the appraiser. In other words, that deduction you are taking better be supported by a credible appraisal or you're in trouble. I like that one. Next year is a real crossroads for the appraisal industry. Will pending legislation create further burden and drive quality appraisers out of the business? Or will the legislation finally address what is truly needed in the industry? And what is needed is a system in which faster/cheaper is not the criteria for hiring an appraiser, but rather who is most qualified. Make lenders and loan officers responsible for hiring the most qualified appraiser like the IRS is beginning to do. And then saving a few hundred dollars on an appraisal fee associated with a $10 million-plus loan might not seem so important. Happy Holidays to everyone and 2009 will be just fine. Christopher Bowler, MAI, SRA, is the 2008 president of the Mass. Appraisal Institute, Malden, Mass.
MORE FROM Finance

Walsh and Sidel of EagleBridge Capital arrange $5.9 million construction mortgage financing for Cedarbrook Homes

Swansea, MA EagleBridge Capital has arranged construction mortgage financing in the amount of $5.9 million for Phase One of Cedarbrook Homes. The mortgage was arranged by EagleBridge senior director Brian Walsh and principal Ted Sidel who stated that the loan was provided by a leading national lender.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4