News: Finance

Retroactive tax benefits for real estate owners! Part 2

Part 1 appeared in the January 11th edition of NEREJ in the Finanical Digest section. 2012 TRA - For tax years beginning in 2012, the 2012 TRA increases the maximum deduction from $139,000 to $500,000. For the 2013 tax year, the act increases the maximum expensing amount from $25,000 to $500,000. Of importance, the 2012 TRA also increases the phase-out amount for both 2012 and 2013 to $2 million. In 2014, this temporary provision will sunset and the maximum deduction will return to $25,000 and the phase-out amount will reset back to $200,000. 15-Year Write-off for Qualified Leasehold, Retail and Restaurant Property Reinstated and Extended Section 1250 property that meets specific criteria could be classified as either qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property or qualified retail improvement property, and could be recovered over a 15-year period using the straight line method. 2012 TRA - The act retroactively extends for two years the inclusion of qualified leasehold improvement property, qualified restaurant property and qualified retail improvement property in the 15-year MACRS class. Such property qualifies for 15-year recovery if it is placed in service before Jan. 1, 2014. Retirement of Structural Improvements: Ever since the end of the Component Depreciation system, Owners have complained about a requirement to continue depreciating physically abandoned assets. Those of you who have been around for a while may recall that the Component Depreciation system conjoined the estimated useful life of an asset and its recovery period. This alleviated the concern of recording a loss on the retirement as long as the asset performed within its life expectancy. However, under the Accelerated Cost Recovery System, the link between the estimated useful life and the recovery period was lost. This resulted in Owners continuing to depreciate items that no longer exist. The roofs, windows and HVAC components do not last 39 years. To make matters worse, IRS guidance required owners to capitalize the costs of the replacement when these systems finally met the end of their useful life. This was not an issue under the Component Depreciation system if the system performed according to their specification. The system would be 100% depreciated when it was time for replacement. Fast forward . . . Under the new regulations, the IRS allows owners to write-off the un-depreciated portion of the retired components on a current and retroactive basis back to 1986. If you have a building and replaced a roof, boiler, or elevator over the last 15 years, you are still depreciating components that no longer exist. Therefore, the time has come to write-off all of the abandoned assets that have accumulated over time. If you retire an asset in 2012 or any future years, you are able to take the appropriate write-off in the relevant tax period. Open a Dialogue that Helps Defer Taxes: Since 2001, Congress has utilized depreciation related tax incentives to induce real estate owners to spend more, as a means to stimulate the economy. The 2012 TRA and the issuance of the new repairs and maintenance regulations earlier this year, which allows the write-off of retired structural components, is in line with this favorable tax strategy. With the top individual tax rates being reset to over 39% for 2013, and real estate tax incentives being reinstated for both 2012 and 2013, it is a perfect time for tax planning. Carefully balancing these incentives coupled with the ability to take advantage of the new repair and maintenance regulations through the use of cost segregation, opens the door to a productive conversation that can significantly benefit all parties. Mark de Stefanis, CCA, is president of Construction Cost Recovery, Inc., White Plains, N.Y.
Tags: Finance
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property