News: Finance

The long awaited collateral underwriter has arrived

The long awaited or perhaps dreaded lender letter from Fannie Mae regarding the collateral underwriter (CU) was sent out to lenders last week (on February 4). Please see the online article by Stephen Sousa, executive vice president relating to this release that was distributed by the MBREA list serve on February 5. This release can be either good news or bad news depending on how, one looks at it. It definitely means that reports produced for Fannie Mae will receive more scrutiny and your client, the lender, will be given more tools to call into question the appropriateness of comparables used and adjustments made. Whether this is proper or warranted at this juncture is moot. Someone got caught doing things that they should not have been doing and as a result greater accountability and transparency is being viewed as what is needed to keep any wrong doings from occurring again. The CU is being touted as a voluntary tool for the lenders to use at no cost to the lender. It is being presented as a "risk management tool." It is not meant to allow the lender to make a decision regarding risk. It is not meant to allow lenders to accept or reject appraisal reports furthermore it does not provide the lender with an opinion of value. The CU provides a risk assessment from 1 (lowest risk) to 5 (highest risk) and risk flags and messages identify "risk factors" that may require more attention. The CU will supply a list of possible comparable sales based on "physical similarity, time and distance." The letter states that price will not be a basis for selection and that it is not an attempt lower or raise the outcome of the appraisal. Location will be a basis of selection and will rely on "Census Block Group levels" a "subset of Census Tracts." The CU is meant for the exclusive use of the lender and is meant to assist them in having a "constructive dialogue with the appraiser". Copies of the CU or excerpts of the CU will not be made available to appraisal management companies or to the appraiser furthermore the lender can not make demands of or provide instructions to the appraiser based on the automated report and finally may not interfere with the "independent judgment" of an appraiser. Finally it is important to note that the CU is available only to approved Fannie-Mae lenders. So it appears, for the time being, that this is a tool for the lender that is meant to open up discussion rather than co-opt the appraiser's judgment or independence. How it is used remains to be seen. Please let MBREA know how this is being implemented and any problems that you are having with your lending clients. There are several offerings through MBREA that are connected to this subject at various locations throughout the region: 2/17/2015: Book of Adjustments Taunton, MA; 2/25/2015: Understanding and Using Comparable Transactions Ludlow, MA; 3/10/2015: Breakfast with the Experts: Residential Appraisal Update Norwood, MA; 3/11/2015: Understanding and Using Comparable Transactions Cape Cod; 3/18/2015: Book of Adjustments Danvers, MA 3/24/2015: Understanding and Using Comparable Transactions Taunton, MA; 3/25/2015: Book of Adjustments Ludlow, MA. Please go to MBREA.org for more information. Richard Simmons Jr. is 2015 president of the Mass. Board of Real Estate Appraisers (MBREA) and is assessor for the town of Lynnfield, Mass.
MORE FROM Finance

C-Lounge Capital provides $18m equity investment for $40m acquisition of Fountains of Boca Raton by Interface Properties

Boca Raton, FL C-Lounge Capital provides $18m equity investment for $40m acquisition of Fountains of Boca Raton by Interface Properties. C-Lounge Capital is a relationship-driven family office investment platform backed by more than 50 years of commercial real estate experience.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4