News: Finance

Subjects assessing team will be discussing at ATB program - by Lane Partridge

Lane Partridge

I was very pleased to be asked to be one of the speakers to represent all Massachusetts assessors, at the MA-RI-ME Chapter of the Appraisal Institute program, on the Appellate Tax Board. I will be joined by Ellen Brideau, chief assessor for the city of Lowell and Michael Tarello MAI, vice president of Vision Government Solutions. Vision is a valuation company specializing in mass appraisal. We will be presenting an overview of the assessing process in establishing values using a Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) system. The Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR), our oversight authority, requires the values be updated to Full and Fair Cash value every year. Full and Fair Cash value is similar to Market Value, but with some slight differences.

The biggest difference between Assessed valuation and Market Value is the date of valuation. Massachusetts General Law Chapter 59, Section 2A requires all property to be valued as of January 1 (“The assessors of each city and town shall determine the fair cash valuation of such real property for the purpose of taxation on the first day of January of each year”). This seems simple, except Municipalities operate on a fiscal year beginning July 1 and even with a CAMA system valuing all the properties in any given Municipalities in less than a year requires a solid background in appraisal theory and statistics. In Barnstable, where I work, there are 27,514 parcels of real estate totaling $21,466,963,606.00 in value.

One of the topics we will cover in our portion of the Program is the valuation dates and the issuance of the tax bills. This is often difficult for the taxpayers and others to follow. Here is a quick explanation using Fiscal Year 2023. The valuation date is January 1, 2022. The data used to establish the values is what occurred in calendar year 2021. In other words we would analyze the sales that occurred in 2021 to adjust the CAMA model to create the values. For commercial values we would use market rents and expenses in 2021 and the two preceding years to establish stabilized net operating income. Capitalization rates would be measured from the market using 2021 sales or from published or calculated rates as close to January 1, 2022 as possible. An assessor has until early fall to finalize the values and get them approved by DOR. Tax rates can’t be approved by DOR until the values have been approved, usually in December. The first time the public will see the tax burden for Fiscal 2023 would be on the January 2023 bill, a year after the valuation date. To complicate it further the four quarters or two semi-annual tax bills are not equal. 

With quarterly billing, the first two tax bills are based on last year’s annual tax burden divided by 4. This is to allow the municipality to get cash flow at the beginning of the fiscal year. The first two quarters have tax bill issue dates of July 1, 2022 and October 1, 2022. As you can see those bills are issued before the values or tax rates are approved. It is one of the reasons that the first two bills do not have valuation data listed on them. .As you can see it can be complicated. 

This is only one of the subjects that the Assessing team will be discussing. We will also talk about full and fair cash value vs market value, an explanation of the property record card, and how to contest an assessed valuation.

We all look forward to the program.

Lane Partridge, MAA is director of assessing at Town of Barnstable, Mass.

MORE FROM Finance

From the mayor’s office to the World Cup: A dynamic season at RE&FA

Boston, MA RE&FA’s spring and summer programming continued to highlight the trends and issues shaping the commercial real estate industry. In May, RE&FA hosted Data Centers in the Current CRE Landscape at The Retreat at 225 Franklin St. The program drew strong engagement and fostered thoughtful discussion around one of commercial real estate’s fastest-growing and most impactful sectors.
READ ON THE GO
DIGITAL EDITIONS
Subscribe
Columns and Thought Leadership
Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Reverse exchanges and the challenges of a competitive real estate market - by Michele Fitzpatrick

Our current, highly competitive real estate market poses specific challenges for investors who are considering taking advantage of a tax-deferred 1031 exchange. In this market, investors will have no problem selling their current property if priced properly, but they may find it difficult to find a suitable replacement property
Massachusetts real estate transfers  over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Massachusetts real estate transfers over $1 million face new tax rules as of November 1st - by Daniel Meyer

Attention to owners of real estate in the Commonwealth (and the title companies and other professionals who advise them), the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) recently adopted a new “millionaire’s tax” via 830 CMR 62B.2.4
The focus on price per s/f compared to the  comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

The focus on price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the appraisal report - by Dennis Chanski

Over the past several weeks, I have completed appraisal assignments for private clients. Interestingly, after submitting these appraisals, I received several phone calls – not to question the value, content, or any incorrect information, but rather to discuss the price per s/f compared to the comparable sales used in the report.
Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

Are appraisers on the same page as the assessor? - by Richard Seman

The purpose of this article is to address problematic or confusing issues which may help assessors and appraisers to better understand how to value real estate for tax assessment purposes.